Anthony Herrera v. Lynch, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY HERRERA, No. 2:24-cv-1660 DJC CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 LYNCH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is defendants’ summary judgment 19 motion. (ECF No. 59.) For the reasons discussed below, this Court recommends that 20 defendants’ summary judgment motion be granted in part and denied in part. 21 I. PLAINTIFF’S…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.