Legal Opinion
Maronyan v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 20, 2011No. 09-56949PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge N.R. SMITH.
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Mariam Maronyan brought suit against Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. Inc. when the new car that she leased developed mechanical problems during the warranty period and Toyota failed to repair them to her satisfaction. In addition to several California state law claims, she alleged breach of warranty under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (“MMWA”). The district court granted Toyota’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that Maronyan did not before filing suit in civil court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Carla Visendi v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Bishop Paiute Tribe v. Inyo CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Denys Honcharov v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Ctr for Biological Diversity v. Ashton CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Loren Shirk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.