Legal Opinion
White v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 5, 1893PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Semble, that where the entry is made under statutory authority the remedy by statute is exclusive. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appealed. The plaintiff is the owner of a lot abutting upon one of the streets of the city of Winston, and brings this action to recover damages for various injuries to her said property, inflicted by the defendant by reason of its having entered upon and constructed its railroad through the said street.
It appears from the complaint that, prior to the plaintiff's (612) purchase of the property in 1879, the street had been "located and opened for…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lahr v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harvey v. Mason City & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Hildebrand v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- High Rock Lake Partners, LLC v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- White v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Hollenbeck v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.