Legal Opinion

State v. Bolden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 2018No. ED 102965-01PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge

Introduction

This case is here for the second time on appeal. Darrell I. Bolden (Defendant) initially appealed his convictions arguing that the trial court violated his constitutional right to counsel by allowing him to waive counsel while at the same time ordering a report regarding Defendant's competency to stand trial. State v. Bolden, No. ED102965, 558 S.W.3d 513, 2016 WL 7106291 (Mo. App. E.D. Dec. 6, 2016) ( Bolden I ). This Court found Defendant's right to counsel was violated by the trial court's failure to appoint counsel until Defendant's competency was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Appel v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. Eley v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Darrell I. Bolden v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API