Legal Opinion

Earnest v. Earnest

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1934No. 6 Div. 595PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

The action was in assumpsit on three counts. So far as this appeal is concerned, it will only be necessary to consider the third count, which claims on a certificate of deposit issued by defendant to plaintiff in the principal sum of $800.00 and containing the following recitals:

“Mary Susan Earnest, daughter of R. M. Earnest, has deposited in this Bank — Bank of Berry — 61—382 ... 800 Dol’s 00 Cts Dollars payable to the order of self or Father R. M. Earnest 6 months after date with interest to maturity only at the rate of 4 per cent per annum on the return of this certificate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Henry Miller, in Error v. David Austen, William S. Wilmerding, and David Austen, Jr.Supreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Sayre v. WeilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Union Trust & Savings Bank v. TylerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Jones v. WeakleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. First Nat. Bank v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Old National Bank & Union Trust Co. v. KendallWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Old National Bank & Union Trust Co. v. KendallWashington Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API