Legal Opinion

Heily v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1988No. A040522PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MERRILL, J.

Petitioner, the plaintiff in a wrongful discharge action, challenges a court order requiring her to arbitrate her dispute under procedures established by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE hereinafter). She contends both that her agreement to arbitrate was procured by fraud and that it should be set aside as unconscionable because of institutional bias in arbitration conducted under the auspices of the NYSE. We reject her contentions.

Petitioner has filed an action against real parties in interest, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith (Merrill Lynch hereinafter) and two…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Cione v. Foresters Equity Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Elliott v. AlbrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API