Legal Opinion
Raheem Howard v. The City of Baton Rouge, et al.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided July 1, 2026No. 3:19-cv-00079Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RAHEEM HOWARD CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 19-79-JWD-EWD THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. STATEMENT OF LEGAL PRINCIPLES RELEVANT TO PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCS. 142, 158) The following legal principles will be used by this Court in rendering oral reasons on the pending motions for summary judgment in this case. (Docs. 142, 158.) I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD1 Motions for summary judgment are governed by Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. “The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.