Legal Opinion

Boyes v. Summers

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1895No. 5257PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the district court of Garfield county. Tried below before Harrison, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.

This is an action by William. R. Summers and Albert B. Summers, partners doing business under the firm name of Summers Bros., against Hiram Boyes, under the provisions of section 15, chapter 32, Compiled Statutes, to recover the sum of $50 for failure to discharge a chattel mortgage. From a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for the above amount, defendant prosecutes error to this court.

At the commencement of the trial the defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence, on the ground that the petition did not state a cause of action. By the-objection it was intended to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cleveland Paper Co. v. BanksNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Glaze v. ParcelNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Lowe v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hastings & Grand Island R. R. v. IngallsNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Clearwater Bank v. KurkonskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Miller v. BryantNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Malarkey v. O'LearyOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Armstrong v. BatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State ex rel. Attorney General v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API