Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1931No. 22439 and 22539PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

(Kinkade, J.).

These two proceedings in error arise out of a single case heard and decided by the Public Utilities Commission.

An application was filed with the commission by the plaintiff in error Ralph W. Secoy, for a certificate to operate a motor freight truck line between the cities of Toledo and Akron, Ohio, over a route specified in the application.

Numerous parties, including the plaintiff in error the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, filed protests against the granting of the Secoy application. A hearing was had before the commission, and an order was made granting the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Board of Railroad Com'rsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1935
  2. Penn-Ohio Coach Lines Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Neylon v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API