Legal Opinion

People v. Baer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11 [1989]), and it forecloses appellate review of the defendant’s claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Cenname, 66 AD3d 795 [2009]; People v Hairston, 53 AD3d 669 [2008]). We note that the defendant was sentenced as a second felony drug offender, a status he does not challenge, and that the court merely misspoke at sentencing when it stated that the defendant was a second violent felony offender. Fisher, J.E,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. HairstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. CennameAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API