Robertson v. New Orleans & G. N. R. Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Anderson, J.,
specially concurred.
I have grave doubts as to the soundness of the decision in this case, and still I am unable to combat, to my entire satisfaction, the reasoning; of the opinion. I therefore yield my doubts and concur in the decision. In doing so, however, I feel that it might answer a good purpose to set'down the principal reasons for my doubts. There are three outstanding facts to be kept in mind in the consideration of this case, namely:(a) Appellee’s terminal yards, storage and switch tracks thereon, as well as its main line and all of its operations in and upon its yards…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Austin v. Augusta Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Pennsylvania R. v. MarchantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Hyde v. M., D. & P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Pennsylvania R. v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Smith v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.