Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Robertson v. New Orleans & G. N. R. Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1930No. 28484Published

1Concurrence

Anderson, J.,

specially concurred.

I have grave doubts as to the soundness of the decision in this case, and still I am unable to combat, to my entire satisfaction, the reasoning; of the opinion. I therefore yield my doubts and concur in the decision. In doing so, however, I feel that it might answer a good purpose to set'down the principal reasons for my doubts. There are three outstanding facts to be kept in mind in the consideration of this case, namely:(a) Appellee’s terminal yards, storage and switch tracks thereon, as well as its main line and all of its operations in and upon its yards…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Austin v. Augusta Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Pennsylvania R. v. MarchantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Hyde v. M., D. & P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Pennsylvania R. v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  5. Smith v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API