Legal Opinion
Becker & Poliakoff v. King
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 21, 1994No. 94-1562PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
642 So.2d 821 (1994)
BECKER & POLIAKOFF, Petitioner,
v.
William KING, Clare King and Nettles Island, Inc., Respondents.
No. 94-1562.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
September 21, 1994.
Keith F. Backer of Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
William King and Clare King, pro se respondents.
KLEIN, Judge.
The trial court denied petitioner law firm's motion to withdraw as counsel, and the law firm seeks review by certiorari. We grant the writ.
The Kings retained the law firm to defend them in a suit brought against them by their condominium association.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fisher v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- PREDDY, KUTNER, HARDY v. KleinschmidtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Hollis v. F.B. Myers & Bro. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. TraversDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
- Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- King & Spalding LLP v. the Residences at the Bath Club Condominium Association, Inc., and the Residences at the Bath Club Maintenance Association, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- Roller v. CRIPE-ROLLERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011