Brooks v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We review the instant petition for writ of certiorari to determine whether the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law which resulted in irreparable harm. The trial court denied a motion to withdraw, filed by the counsel for the petitioner, for petitioner’s failure to pay attorney’s fees. We find that there was no departure and deny the petition.
The trial court’s denial of the motion to withdraw resulted in irreparable harm, but there was no departure from the essential requirements of law. See Fisher v. State, 248 So.2d 479 (Fla.1971). Withdrawal may generally be granted…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fisher v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Becker & Poliakoff v. KingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
3Cited by3 opinions
- BARRY MICHAEL SCHULTZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
- King & Spalding LLP v. the Residences at the Bath Club Condominium Association, Inc., and the Residences at the Bath Club Maintenance Association, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- MELISSA DELACRUZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019