Legal Opinion
Haberern v. KAUPP VASCULAR SURGEONS BEN. PLAN
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 12, 1993No. Civ. A. 88-1853PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, DISCUSSION, AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HUYETT, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ruth Haberern from 1974 to 1985 worked full-time as a secretary-bookkeeper for a professional corporation formerly known as Kaupp Vascular Surgeons, Ltd., and later known as Lehigh Valley Vascular Surgeons, Ltd. Defendants are the professional corporation, its defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans, and the trustee of those plans. Plaintiff commenced this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001-1461 (West 1985 & Supp.1992). Plaintiff seeks to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Leroy D. Schoch v. First Fidelity Bancorporation and Industrial Valley Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Haberern v. Kaupp Vascular Surgeons Ltd. Defined Benefit Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- End of the Road Trust Ex Rel. Fruehauf Trailer Corp. v. Terex Corp. (In Re Fruehauf Trailer Corp.)District Court, D. Delaware · 2000
- Simpson v. Ernst & YoungDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
- Maiuro v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- DeWitt v. Penn-Del Directory Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.