Legal Opinion

Evans v. Ruth

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1937No. Appeals, 72 to 76PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

James S. Evans brought an action in assumpsit against Homer Ruth, trading as the Ruth Lumber and Supply-Company, to recover $131.11 alleged to be due for hauling stone under an oral contract. It was agreed upon the record at the time of the trial that the disposition of this case shall govern four other actions’ against the defendant, brought by Roy W. Stafford, Fred M. Schwartz, W. M. Keown, and A. M. Kaldusan.

It appears from the evidence that in the fall of 1933, Ruth was awarded by the State Department of Property and Supplies two purchase orders under which he was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lawall v. GromanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Yubas v. MakranskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Lewis v. MatiasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Garrett v. GonterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  5. Bell v. Scranton Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Midland Credit Co. v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. DeSilvio v. RestauireSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Salutations, Inc. v. Paradies ShopsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API