Legal Opinion
Prather v. CITY OF CARL JUNCTION, MO.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 29, 2011No. SD 30470PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NANCY STEFFEN RAHMEYER, Presiding Judge.
The City of Carl Junction, Missouri (“the City”), appeals a judgment entered against it after a jury trial for inverse condemnation. The City brings four points on appeal. Darren Prather (“Respondent”), in whose favor the judgment was entered, moves to dismiss the appeal for Rule 84.04 1 violations, primarily the failure to set forth a fair and concise statement of facts pursuant to Rule 84.04. In fact, the City’s statement of facts does not comply with Rule 84.04(c).
Rule 84.04(c) provides “[t]he statement of facts shall be a fair and concise statement…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clevenger v. Oliver Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Nodaway Valley Bank v. E.L. Crawford Construction, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Johnson v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Watson v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Evans v. Groves Iron WorksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Osthus v. Countrylane Woods II Homeowners Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jones v. BuckMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Kenneth Bell & Nez, Inc. v. Baldwin Chevrolet Cadillac, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Dickens v. Hannah's Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- TRAVIS GIBSON v. CATHERINE RICE, Defendant-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.