Legal Opinion

Harold X v. Brierley

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1978No. Civ. A. 76-3582PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LUONGO, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a prisoner confined at the State Correctional Institution at Graterford, Pennsylvania, filed this complaint pro se on November 23, 1976. He alleges that the statewide inmate compensation system, currently in force at Graterford, violates his civil rights. Plaintiff seeks damages and equitable relief under the 1871 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (1970), and the 1866 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1970), as well as declaratory relief. Defendants are the Pennsylvania Commissioner of Correction, a special consultant to the Commissioner who…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ludwig v. KowalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  2. Cumbey v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Frank v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Wojtczak v. CuylerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Woodall v. PartillaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API