Legal Opinion

Koch v. Dollison

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1981No. 81AP-117PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormac, J.

Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment of the trial court that his driving rights be suspended pursuant to R.C. 4511.191, the implied consent law. Plaintiff asserts that the trial court erred in holding that R.C. 4511.191 applies to those persons arrested for the offense of driving while under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs.

Plaintiff was arrested for the offense of driving while under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs. He was requested to submit to a chemical test or tests of his blood, breath or urine and, after being advised of the consequences, refused to do so. The Bureau of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GrubbOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State v. Szalai, Ashtabula County Courts, Ohio1983
  3. FILLMORE LLC v. Fillmore MacHine & Tool Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. EbrightOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API