Legal Opinion
United States v. Nazih Tadros
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 15, 2002No. 01-4242PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
A jury found Nazih Tadros guilty of mail fraud and wire fraud for engaging in a scheme to defraud several insurance companies by submitting false information to them about a purported disability and his ability to work. The defendant claims that the government failed to disclose information in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), that the government failed to prove the elements of the fraud beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the indictment was returned after the relevant statute of limitations had expired. We…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Algie Crivens v. Thomas P. Roth, Warden, Dixon Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Peter S. Dimas and Ramon RomanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Lynne A. Carnegie, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Household International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. John J. Leahy, William E. Stratton, James M. Duff, and Terrence DolanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Demetrius McCann Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Sam A. Mangialardi, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Carvajal v. DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- David M. Williams v. Aztar Indiana Gaming Corporation F/d/b/a Casino Aztar, and Aztar Indiana Gaming Company, LLC D/B/A Casino AztarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.