Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State ex rel. Smith v. Boles

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1965No. 12485Published

1ConcurrenceBrowning, Judge

I am in agreement with the majority of this Court to deny the petitioner the relief sought and remand him to the penitentiary. However, I am not wholly in agreement with the single syllabus point, the majority opinion, the dissenting opinion or the separate concurring opinion, which were filed in the clerk’s office in that order. There is no question in this case relative to counsel; therefore it is not controlled by Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799, 93 A.L.R. 2d 733, and State ex rel. May v. Boles, Warden, 149 W. Va. 155, 139 S. E. 2d 177. It is good, in my…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State Ex Rel. May v. BolesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Starcher v. South Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Ex parte MooneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API