Legal Opinion

Swann v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 29, 1941No. 6 Div. 854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

“It is a cardinal rule of pleading in equity, as has been said by this court, founded in reason and good sense, that a bill must show the complainant’s title to relief with sufficient certainty and clearness to enable the court to see plainly that he has such a right as warrants its interference, and the defendant to be distinctly informed of the nature of the cáse which he is called upon to defend. Matters essential to the complainant’s right to relief must appear, not by inference, but by direct and unambiguous averment. Cockrell v. Gurley, 26 Ala. 405; Duckworth v.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Mobile Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Cockrell v. GurleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  3. Duckworth v. Duckworth's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  4. Goldsby v. GoldsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Savannah & Memphis Rail Road v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Christian v. RabrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. KendrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Christian v. RabrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API