Legal Opinion

Peters v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1929PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

The defendant insured plaintiff’s husband against death resulting from bodily injuries caused solely through external, violent, and accidental means, except where such death resulted “ from having been engaged in aviation or submarine operations or military or naval service in time of war.” He was *781killed while riding as a passenger in an airplane, and it is now claimed that his death resulted while “ engaged in aviation,” and that the phrase “ in time of war ” does not apply to this situation. The clause quoted above is ambiguous, it is apparent, from the opposing constructions which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . BrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Travelers Insurance v. PeakeSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  3. Meredith v. Business Men's Accident Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Head v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  3. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  4. Price v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  5. Charette v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API