Legal Opinion

State v. Ervin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 2013No. SD 31950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffrey W. Bates, J.

Jonathon Ervin (Defendant) was convicted of one count of statutory sodomy in the first degree. See § 566.062.1 On appeal, Defendant argues that the trial court erred in admitting a portion of Defendant’s videotaped interrogation. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction. We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict. State v. Dillard, 158 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. 2005). So viewed, the following evidence was adduced at trial.

On June 4, 2010, Defendant was living at his grandfather Lawrence’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Wainwright v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. DexterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. State v. FrazierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jonathan Ervin v. Michael BowersoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. State v. MasonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DEPARIS D. TOWNSEND, Defendant-AppellantMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. State of Missouri v. Michael L. EllmakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API