Legal Opinion
Martin v. CitiFinancial Services, Inc. (In re Martin)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California
Decided April 10, 2013No. Bankruptcy No. 09-25459-E-13; Adversary No. 12-2596PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DECISION
RONALD H. SARGIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
On October 4, 2012, Robin Teresa Martin (“Plaintiff’) commenced this Adversary Proceeding for a determination that the lien, encumbrance, and interest asserted by CitiFinancial Services, Inc. (“Defendant”), in real property commonly known as 41 Monarch Drive, Oroville, California (the “Property”) pursuant to a deed of trust (“Deed of Trust”) are void and of no force and effect. The default of Defendant was entered on December 12, 2012.1 As ordered by the court, Plaintiff filed and served the present motion for entry of a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- In Re Sieglinde M. Zimmer, Debtor, Sieglinde M. Zimmer v. Psb Lending CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Relativity Fashion, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Luchini v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In re Luchini)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2014
- (BK) In Re: BuettnerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Buettner, III v. Residential Funding CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2023
- In re: Jeffrey Mark FreemanUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.