Legal Opinion
Elizabeth Cruz and Hilarino Aparicio v. City of San Diego, et al.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 16, 2026No. 3:24-cv-00287Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ELIZABETH CRUZ and HILARINO Case No.: 24-cv-0287-AJB-MSB APARICIO, 12 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 14 CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., (Doc. No. 52) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Before the Court is Defendants City of San Diego (“the City”) and Chief David 18 Nisleit’s (“Chief Nisleit”) (collectively, “Defendants”)1 motion to dismiss Plaintiffs 19 Elizabeth Cruz and Hilarino Aparicio’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Third Amended 20 Complaint (Doc. No. 45, “TAC”)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Smilecare Dental Group v. Delta Dental Plan of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.