GEICO Indemnity v. Roth
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Frank Caruso, J.), entered August 29, 2007 in a declaratory judgment action. The order denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment seeking a declaration that plaintiff has no duty to defend or indemnify defendant Scott C. Mayer, Jr. in the underlying personal injury action.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted and judgment is granted in favor of plaintiff as follows: “It is ADJUDGED AND DECLARED that plaintiff has no duty to defend or indemnify…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barile v. KavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Badio v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Berrios v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CherianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by1 opinion
- Momenian v. DavidsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020