Legal Opinion

Momenian v. Davidson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 1, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2015-0828Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) HOUSHANG MOMENIAN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 1:15-cv-00828 (APM) ) MICHAEL M. DAVIDSON, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Houshang Momenian, Vida Momenian, and the Houshang Momenian Revocable Trust are seeking to recover against the Momenians’ former lawyer, Defendant Michael Davidson, for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant negligently represented the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Talavera v. ShahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  5. Schneider, Rene' v. Kissinger, Henry A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API