Legal Opinion

Doe v. Roe

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 16, 1930No. 3PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.:

It is one of the details that helps to show adverse possession.

Rice, J., also stated that he thought the question was admissible on that ground.

Mr. Tunnell: If they do not claim that it is evidence of title but only an assertion of a claim, I will not take the time to examine the Delaware cases, and will withdraw my objection for the present.

The question was then repeated and the defendant stated that he had paid the taxes on the property in dispute.

*234The jury disagreed and was discharged.

At the beginning of the second trial, plaintiff’s attorney requested the Prothonotary to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grossman v. Delaware Electric Power Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Department v. PhillipsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
  2. Steller v. DavidSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
  3. Deakyne v. Lewes Anglers, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
  4. Phillips v. State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  5. Doe v. RoeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API