Legal Opinion

Tereszkiewicz v. Tereszkiewicz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 1987PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Roncallo, J.), dated April 2, 1984, as (1) awarded the plaintiff wife the principal sum of $82,666.50, representing a one-half interest in the present value of the defendant’s retirement benefits; (2) awarded the plaintiff the sum of $200 per week for her support and maintenance; (3) awarded the plaintiff counsel fees in the sum of $5,000; and (4) directed that the defendant transfer his interest in the marital residence,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Damiano v. DamianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Rodgers v. RodgersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Majauskas v. MajauskasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gluck v. GluckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. De La Torre v. De La TorreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Keehn v. KeehnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Buzzeo v. BuzzeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Kallins v. KallinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API