Legal Opinion

Smith v. PACE, a SUBURBAN BUS DIV.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 2001No. 1—00—3748, 1—00—3750 consPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman

Timothy Smith, the plaintiff in this refiled negligence action, was barred from introducing any evidence in support of his claim for lost income and also barred from calling any witnesses upon the trial of the cause by reason of his having failed to comply with discovery in his original action. Thereafter, on motion of the defendant, Gerald Rapaport, the circuit court entered summary judgment against the plaintiff, finding that, absent an ability to call witnesses, he would be unable to meet his burden of proof. The plaintiff appeals from the summary judgment in favor of Rapaport and from the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Burtell v. First Charter Service Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. BarthIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. BuaIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In re Marriage of VerdungIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Kahle v. John Deere Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Nedzvekas v. FungAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. Bachman v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Curtis v. LofyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Donnellan v. First Student, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. Inman v. Howe Freightways, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API