Legal Opinion

People v. Shane

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 2004No. G032339PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, J.

This case comes to us on certification from the appellate division of the superior court to decide two unsettled questions of law; (1) whether a trial court’s due diligence determination in the context of a defendant’s right to a speedy trial is subject to independent review or is limited to review for abuse of discretion; and (2) whether, as a matter of law, the prosecution was required to subpoena a key witness more than four days before trial in a misdemeanor case to show due diligence, and thus good cause for the delay, when the trial date could have been advanced to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. CromerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Townsend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. SuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. BAUSTERT v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. People v. TatumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Burgos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Jensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API