Legal Opinion

State v. Morreira

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 26, 2001No. 18874-4-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, C.J.

Robert A. Morreira entered an Alford1 plea of guilty to assault in the second degree. This court vacated Mr. Morreira’s exceptional sentence of 100 months. On remand, the sentencing court held a real facts evidentiary hearing and subsequently imposed a 100-month sentence. Mr. Morreira appeals again, alleging, among other things, that the sentencing court violated the real facts doctrine by relying on facts probative of first degree assault. We conclude that the trial court violated the real facts doctrine because the court relied on facts establishing the intent element of a more serious…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. State v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. State v. ZatkovichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. State v. ZatkovichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. State v. MorreiraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API