Hill v. Alexander
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to Howard Circuit Court. — Hon. GL H. Burckhartt, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Philips, C.
This is in the nature of an equitable partition suit between the beneficiaries under the will of Archibald Hill, begun in 1877. 'It appears that Archibald Hill left a will executed in April, 1871, and whicn was duly probated in 1877. The provisions of the will pertinent to this controversy are the fourth and fifth clauses, as follows :
Fourth. It is my will and I devise that all my estate, after the payment of my debts and funeral expenses, real, personal and mixed, he equally divided, share'and share alike, between all my children, except my son Archibald B. Hill, and that in such…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. RaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Bailey v. IngleeNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
- Harrison v. BartlettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Gaylords v. KelshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Lambert v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adair v. MetteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Bank on Warren County v. KembleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- Trustees of Catawba College v. FetzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- City of St. Louis v. SiefererSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892