Legal Opinion
Fargas v. Cincinnati Machine, LLC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 12, 2013No. 13 Civ. 4443(JGK)PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
The plaintiff, Felix Fargas, commenced an action against the defendants Cincinnati Machine, LLC (“Cincinnati Machine”) and MAG IAS, LLC (“MAG”) in the New York State Supreme Court, Bronx County, for injuries he allegedly sustained when operating an industrial machine manufactured by a predecessor of MAG. The defendants removed the action to this Court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1446 based on diversity of citizenship jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The defendants now move to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), or, in the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Mosdos Chofetz Chaim, Inc. v. RBS Citizens, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Kaplan, Inc. v. YunDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Gersbacher v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- National Convention Services, L.L.C. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.