Legal Opinion

Doe v. Doe

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 21, 1933No. 55PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The annulment of the marriage is granted upon both grounds alleged in the petition.

This Court, in Williams v. Williams, 2 W. W. Harr. (32 Del.) 39, 118 A. 638, held that fraud constituting a ground for annulling a marriage under the Revised Code of 1915, § 3004, paragraph d, must be fraud which went to the very essence of the marriage contract. In this case the fraud alleged and proved by the plaintiff does go to the essence of the contract relation. The authorities are uniform in holding that the concealment of a venereal disease of a serious…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Svenson v. . SvensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Ryder v. RyderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
  3. Williams v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
  4. Crane v. CraneNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1901
  5. AnonymousNew York Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anonymous v. AnonymousSuperior Court of Delaware · 1951
  2. du Pont v. du PontSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Du Pont v. Du PontSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Watson v. Watson (mo.app.st.L. 1940)Missouri Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Babis v. BabisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API