Legal Opinion

Watson v. Watson (mo.app.st.L. 1940)

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1940No. 25405PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for the annulment of the marriage contracted between plaintiff and defendant, on the ground that defendant fraudulently misrepresented and concealed from plaintiff the fact that she was afflicted with syphilis prior to the marriage.

Defendant being insane, Thomas P. Lahey was appointed as her guardian ad litem to represent her in this action.

The trial resulted in a judgment for defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

The record shows an undisputed state of facts. Plaintiff and defendant were married in January, 1933, in St. Louis. Prior to the marriage defendant worked for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Svenson v. . SvensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Ryder v. RyderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
  3. Sobol v. SobolNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Crane v. CraneNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1901
  5. Jordan v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Stone v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  3. Charley v. FantMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Kshaiboon v. KshaiboonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. MacE v. MacESupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API