Legal Opinion
Berg v. Board of Education
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 30, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, J.:
The petitioner by this proceeding seeks to review the action of the board of education of the city of Utica on his claim for services as architect.
There is little dispute in the facts. It is admitted that in June, 1919, petitioner was employed by the board of education to submit plans for a proposed junior high school; that he made such plans and specifications; that the project of constructing the school was abandoned in April, 1920; and that he is entitled to compensation. Disagreement exists only as to the amount. The petitioner claims that he is entitled to $50,154.61. The board…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People Ex Rel. McAleer v. . FrenchNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- People ex rel. Oppenheimer Publishing & Printing Co. v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- In re LanehartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- People ex rel. Haverty v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Kiehm v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by1 opinion
- Berg v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928