Legal Opinion

Kiehm v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Board of Education of the City of Utica refused to audit the claim of the petitioners upon the ground that it did not have authority so to do. Upon return to this court upon the writ of certiorari based upon such action of the board, this court held that the board did have authority to audit the claim, it sustained the writ and directed the board to audit the claim of the petitioners upon the merits. (People ex rel. Kiehm v. Board of Education, 198 App. Div. 476.) Thereafter various hearings were had and the petitioners furnished evidence to the effect that their claim was just and legal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Kiehm v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. People ex rel. McMillen v. VanderpoelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Berg v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API