Legal Opinion
Martin Douglas Frantz v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Decided May 19, 2020No. 15440-18WUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
T.C. Memo. 2020-64
UNITED STATES TAX COURT MARTIN DOUGLAS FRANTZ, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 15440-18W. Filed May 19, 2020. Martin Douglas Frantz, pro se. Nicholas R. Rosado and Michael Skeen, for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION URDA, Judge: Petitioner, Martin Douglas Frantz, seeks review under section 7623(b)(4) of determinations of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Whistleblower Office (WBO) that declined to make whistleblower awards to him -2- [*2] and his wife.1 Mr. and Mrs. Frantz submitted an award application to the WBO asserting that the trustee…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
- Florida Peach Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.