Dyker Meadow Land & Improvement Co. v. Cook
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Chapter 622 of the Laws of 1886, referred to in the opinion, is entitled “ An act to amend the title of and ' to amend an act entitled c An act relating to the assessment of real property in the city of Brooklyn, county of Kings, owned and occupied by charitable corporations, societies or institutions,’ passed May twenty-fourth, eighteen hundred and…
Read the full summary
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Chapter 622 of the Laws of 1886, referred to in the opinion, is entitled “ An act to amend the title of and ' to amend an act entitled c An act relating to the assessment of real property in the city of Brooklyn, county of Kings, owned and occupied by charitable corporations, societies or institutions,’ passed May twenty-fourth, eighteen hundred and seventy-eight.”
1Opinion of the Court
Brown, P. J.:
This case has been agreed upon by the parties, and is submitted to the court pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The plaintiff is the owner of land on the west side of Seventh avenue in that part of the city of Brooklyn which formerly constituted the. town of New Utrecht. It has entered into a contract with the defendant to convey to it a portion of said land, and the controversy between the parties relates to the validity of an- assessment imposed upon said land for the grading of said avenue. It is the defendant’s contention that said assessment is a lien…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- People Ex Rel. Griffin v. Mayor of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- People Ex Rel. City of Rochester v. BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- In the Matter of Van AntwerpNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Astor v. Arcade Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Voss v. Waterloo Water Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
- In re Brooklyn Children's Aid SocietyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- People Ex Rel. Olin v. . HennessyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- In re TuthillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.