Legal Opinion

United States v. Tadish

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 15, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Steve Tadish and others were indicted for introducing intoxicating liquor into Indian country, and on the trial moved for a directed verdict.

1Opinion of the Court

SAWTEEEE, District Judge.

The indictment in this case charges that:

“Steve Tadish, -Andrew Sitka, Antonio Plieh, Chris Wieeh, and Stephen Bovvavich, on or about the 10th day of October, 1913, at the county of Gila, in the said district and within the jurisdiction of said court, did unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously introduce intoxicating liquor, to wit, one gill of whisky, into and upon the Indian country, to wit, into and upon the San Carlos Division of the White Mountain Indian Reservation, in the county of Gila, state and district of Arizona.”

The testimony discloses that the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Four Bottles Sour-Mash WhiskyDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1898
  2. United States v. CarrMontana Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Butterfield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  2. United States v. One 1941 4-Door Buick SedanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API