United States v. Four Bottles Sour-Mash Whisky
District Court, D. Washington
This is a proceeding by tbe United States for tbe forfeiture of certain liquors. Heard on demurrer to a plea filed by the claimant.
1Opinion of the Court
HANFORD, District Judge.
This is a case of seizure under the statutes of the United States prohibiting tbe introduction of spirituous or other intoxicating liquors into the Indian country. Rev. St. U. S. §§ 2139, 2140; 29 Stat. p. 506, c. 109. The information filed by the United States attorney charges that on tbe 10th day of August, 1898, *721one Daniel P. Bagnell did unlawfully take upon tlie Colville Indian reservation, in tlie state of Washing Lon, a stock of spirituous liquors, wines, and malt liquors, and did establish a saloon in a building upon said reservation, contrary to the provisions…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson & Graham's Lessee v. McIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Bates v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Spalding v. ChandlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Byers v. We-Wa-NeOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Townsend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- United States v. TadishDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1913
- Butterfield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- People v. Fortuna EstatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.