Florentine Corp., Inc. v. Peda I, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
This is an action for rent and other sums alleged to be due under a lease agreement. The jury found that the appellant fraudulently induced the respondents to enter the lease. A verdict was rendered for the respondents but no damages, either actual or punitive, were awarded. The appellant contends that the trial judge should have granted the appellant’s motions for a directed verdict, involuntary non-suit, judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or a new trial, based on the respondents’ failure to establish a prima facie case of fraud. We agree. The judgment below is reversed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Graham v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Lillie B. Thomas v. the Amer. WorkmenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- King v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Parks v. Morris Homes Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Food Lion, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- First State Savings & Loan v. PhelpsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Aries Realty, Inc. v. AGS Columbia AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Slack v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.