Legal Opinion

Florentine Corp., Inc. v. Peda I, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 17, 1985No. 22429PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

This is an action for rent and other sums alleged to be due under a lease agreement. The jury found that the appellant fraudulently induced the respondents to enter the lease. A verdict was rendered for the respondents but no damages, either actual or punitive, were awarded. The appellant contends that the trial judge should have granted the appellant’s motions for a directed verdict, involuntary non-suit, judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or a new trial, based on the respondents’ failure to establish a prima facie case of fraud. We agree. The judgment below is reversed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Graham v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Lillie B. Thomas v. the Amer. WorkmenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  4. King v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Parks v. Morris Homes Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Food Lion, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  3. First State Savings & Loan v. PhelpsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Aries Realty, Inc. v. AGS Columbia AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. Slack v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API