Legal Opinion

Hellman v. Polaris Industries, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 16, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00949Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MICHAEL HELLMAN, individually on No. 2:21-cv-00949-JAM-DMC behalf of himself and all others 10 similarly situated; FRANCISCO BERLANGA, individually on behalf 11 of himself and all others ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND similarly situated; TIM ARTOFF, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 12 individually on behalf of MOTION TO DISMISS himself and all others similarly 13 situated; CY MITCHELL, individually on behalf of 14 himself and all others similarly situated; and JONATHAN LOLLAR, 15 individually on behalf of himself and all…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API