Legal Opinion

Bloomer v. Glendy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 8, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from, Des Moines District Gov/rt. Aotions for the abatement of nuisances, and to enjoin defendants from maintaining and continuing the same. The district court rendered judgment as prayed for in the petition, and defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

The complaint of the appellants in these cases is that the evidence introduced in the district court did not warrant the court in entering judgment for plaintiff. The defendants did not answer in either case. It is alleged in the petition in each case that, in a building which is specifically described, the defendants had established, and were maintaining, a place for the sale of intoxicating- liquors, contrary to the statutes of the state, and that in said building they kept such liquors for sale, contrary to law, and there sold the same unlawfully. These allegations, not being controverted,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alexander v. DoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Minear v. HoggSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Wheelock v. HullSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. In Re Trusteeship of BoydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  4. Sowles v. MartensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Smith v. TateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API