Legal Opinion

Minear v. Hogg

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 21, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Calhoun District Court. — Hon. Charles D. Goldsmith, Judge. This is a proceeding in pairtitioin. Thle court granted! the prayer of plaintiffs’ petition, and defendants Sarah Bell Moody, W. C. Moody, Jr., and! Peter Turner appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

The petition alleges in substance, that on or about November 1, 1889, one W. C. Moody died testate in Calhoun county, Iowa, seized of certain real estate, a particular description of which it is unnecessary to set out; that his will was duly admitted to probate in the district court of Calhoun county, Iowa; that the deceased, after making certain specific bequests* devised and 'bequeathed the remainder of his estate to his five children, share and share alike, viz: W..C. Moody, Jr., Corinth Hogg, nee M'oody, Sarah J. Glover, Lucretia M. Minear, and Lucy Emma De Moss; that on April 28,1891, W.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. McCrary v. TaskerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Creswell v. SlackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. Hadley v. GregorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  5. Conger v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Corbin v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Hansen's Empire Fur Factory v. TeaboutSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. Mullinnix v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Chapman v. KullmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API