(HC) Baca v. Robertson
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES MARTIN BACA, No. 2:22-cv-01481 TLN KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 JAMES ROBERTSON,1 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 19 Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford 20 the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. See 28 21 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.