Legal Opinion
Pearson Education, Inc. v. Ishayev
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 24, 2014No. 11 Civ. 5052(PAE)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Pearson Education, Inc. (“Pearson”), John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (“Wiley”), Cengage Learning, Inc. (“Cengage”), and McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC (“McGraw-Hill”) (collectively, the “publishers”) bring claims of copyright infringement against pro se defendant La-zar Ishayev (“Ishayev”), whom they allege does business as “Solutions Direct,” “Solu-tions4Less,” “TextbookAnswers,” and/or • “SolutionManuals-Testbanks.com.” The publishers claim that Ishayev violated the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 501 et seq., and willfully…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Holcomb v. Iona CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- IF Merchandise, LLC v. Kangaroo Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Jiang v. NBCUIVERSAL Media, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025