Legal Opinion

City Council v. Loftis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1923No. 3579PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The defendants insist that the plaintiff had a complete and adequate remedy at law. The ordinance of the City of Augusta makes the plumbing inspector “ the judge of the quality of the material and workmanship ” employed in the erection of buildings in that municipality. This ordinance further provides that should •any difference of opinion arise between the inspector and a builder, an “appeal must be made at once, in writing, to the Board of Health, stating full particulars of disputed points clearly, and ■copy of same furnished the Inspector of Plumbing in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Loeb v. JenningsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Mayor of Shellman v. SaxonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Mayor of Savannah v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Hudspeth v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. Georgia Public-Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. City of Atlanta v. Universal Film Exchanges Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. New Mission Baptist Church v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Manning v. A. A. B. Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API