City Council v. Loftis
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The defendants insist that the plaintiff had a complete and adequate remedy at law. The ordinance of the City of Augusta makes the plumbing inspector “ the judge of the quality of the material and workmanship ” employed in the erection of buildings in that municipality. This ordinance further provides that should •any difference of opinion arise between the inspector and a builder, an “appeal must be made at once, in writing, to the Board of Health, stating full particulars of disputed points clearly, and ■copy of same furnished the Inspector of Plumbing in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Loeb v. JenningsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Mayor of Shellman v. SaxonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Mayor of Savannah v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Hudspeth v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. Georgia Public-Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- City of Atlanta v. Universal Film Exchanges Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- New Mission Baptist Church v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Manning v. A. A. B. Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.