Legal Opinion

Di Laura v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 2, 1949No. Claim No. 28459Published

1Per curiam

The order for examination and production was granted pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 2 of section 17 of the Court of Claims Act and section 296 of the Civil Practice Act. While section 296 of the Civil Practice Act may be held to implement section 17 of the Court of Claims Act (Buchalter v. State of New York, 172 Misc. 420; Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. State of New York, 174 Misc. 743), there is no statutory authority by which the claimant may avail himself of the provisions of section 324 of the Civil Practice Act. In this case it is sought to examine certain State officers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
  2. Buchalter v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API